Gays in Military ... for now

Radio and Media
Republicans
Nationalism etc.
Active Shooters
Gays in Military
Micheal Savage
BIBLE
Post Reply
User avatar
TheeTFD
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:54 am
Location: ABQ, NM
Contact:

Gays in Military ... for now

Post by TheeTFD »

_______ Considering the gay male makes up only a ~ .05 - .18% of the national total. A significant minority, yet a 65-33 Congressional win, their caucus must be strong.
I would approve an all straight branch like the Marines wanted.
On the whole it could be a blow against hate.
----------
For me I see a correction made. For those whom were ostracized yet performed their duty.
----------
Look how far man has had to come to get to this, recession economy, military need [?] tolerance promoted, law and order to enforce. A nation and people that can handle it.
What happens when a gay General influences war decisions.
----------
So now we'll put a recessive gene in close quarters with like recessive genes [leszi and fag] what will we get? A proliferation of non-parenting unions making recessively reduced offspring. With a venereal disease a bonus. WoW, the military could be the sexual disease company of the world.
----------
Although like genes excite like genes, you need to promote enhanced genes. We hope not to be smallish, beady eyed, pug nosed, skinny headed beginner people. Which is the core of gayness. Don't we all want to be resolute or near resolute ?
This kind of beginner, sloppy, unattractive, degraded/diminished semi-procreation should be minimized !
User avatar
TheeTFD
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:54 am
Location: ABQ, NM
Contact:

China to renigg on birthing policies ?!

Post by TheeTFD »

------US WORLD ELECTION 2012 SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POP CULTURE
Chinese think tank urges end to one-child policy

8 hr ago By Alexa Olesen
The state-backed think tank suggests phasing out the 30-year-old birth limits over the next three years.

BEIJING — A Chinese government think tank is urging the country's leaders to start phasing out its one-child policy immediately and allow two children for every family by 2015, a daring proposal to do away with the unpopular policy.

Some demographers see the timeline put forward by the China Development Research Foundation as a bold move by the body close to the central leadership. Others warn that the gradual approach, if implemented, would still be insufficient to help correct the problems that China's strict birth limits have created.

Xie Meng, a press affairs official with the foundation, said the final version of the report wil be released "in a week or two." But Chinese state media have been given advance copies. The official Xinhua News Agency said the foundation recommends a two-child policy in some provinces from this year and a nationwide two-child policy by 2015. It proposes all birth limits be dropped by 2020, Xinhua reported.

"China has paid a huge political and social cost for the policy, as it has resulted in social conflict, high administrative costs and led indirectly to a long-term gender imbalance at birth," Xinhua said, citing the report.

But it remains unclear whether Chinese leaders are ready to take up the recommendations. China's National Population and Family Planning Commission had no immediate comment on the report Wednesday.

Known to many as the one-child policy, China's actual rules are more complicated. The government limits most urban couples to one child, and allows two children for rural families if their first-born is a girl. There are numerous other exceptions as well, including looser rules for minority families and a two-child limit for parents who are themselves both singletons.

Cai Yong, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, said the report holds extra weight because the think tank is under the State Council, China's Cabinet. He said he found it remarkable that state-backed demographers were willing to publicly propose such a detailed schedule and plan on how to get rid of China's birth limits.

"That tells us at least that policy change is inevitable, it's coming," said Cai, who was not involved in the drafting of the report but knows many of the experts who were. Cai is currently a visiting scholar at Fudan University in Shanghai. "It's coming, but we cannot predict when exactly it will come."

Adding to the uncertainty is a once-in-a-decade leadership transition that kicks off Nov. 8 that will see a new slate of top leaders installed by next spring. Cai said the transition could keep population reform on the back burner or changes might be rushed through to help burnish the reputations of President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao on their way out.

There has been growing speculation among Chinese media, experts and ordinary people about whether the government will soon relax the one-child policy — introduced in 1980 as a temporary measure to curb surging population growth — and allow more people to have two children.
continued
# :idea: Trump and Putin out of the picture !
User avatar
TheeTFD
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:54 am
Location: ABQ, NM
Contact:

Re: Gays in Military ... for now

Post by TheeTFD »

Though the government credits the policy with preventing hundreds of millions of births and helping lift countless families out of poverty, it is reviled by many ordinary people. The strict limits have led to forced abortions and sterilizations, even though such measures are illegal. Couples who flout the rules face hefty fines, seizure of their property and loss of their jobs.

Many demographers argue that the policy has worsened the country's aging crisis by limiting the size of the young labor pool that must support the large baby boom generation as it retires. They say it has contributed to the imbalanced sex ratio by encouraging families to abort baby girls, preferring to try for a male heir.

The government recognizes those problems and has tried to address them by boosting social services for the elderly. It has also banned sex-selective abortion and rewarded rural families whose only child is a girl.

Many today also see the birth limits as outdated, a relic of the era when housing, jobs and food were provided by the state.

"It has been thirty years since our planned economy was liberalized," commented Wang Yi, the owner of a shop that sells textiles online, under a news report on the foundation's proposal. "So why do we still have to plan our population?"

Though open debate about the policy has flourished in state media and on the Internet, leaders have so far expressed a desire to maintain the status quo. President Hu said last year that China would keep its strict family planning policy to keep the birth rate low and other officials have said that no changes are expected until at least 2015.
Wang Feng, director of the Brookings-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy and an expert on China's demographics, contributed research material to the foundation's report but has yet to see the full text. He said he welcomed the gist of the document that he's seen in state media.

It says the government "should return the rights of reproduction to the people," he said. "That's very bold."

Gu Baochang, a professor of demography at Beijing's Renmin University and a vocal advocate of reform, said the proposed timeline wasn't aggressive enough.

"They should have reformed this policy ages ago," he said. "It just keeps getting held up, delayed."
----------------------
No China No !!!
-----------Aren't male children born more evil ? As soon as males learn physical violence can enhance their needs, they use it. Then after beatings from their parents they become more subdued. That's if they have conscientious parents. But the issue here is what started this Chinese policy is: Unbridled birthing by a reckless society that thought the more the merrier ! We need more females so they can sheathe the future male angst.
Which is typical of all human existence, let the fornicators have their unbridled families and worry about wars, hunger, overpopulation governing policies that can't keep up with exponential growth. Remember it was these ALL families, that eventually needed ethnic cleansing. And they
found ways to exterminate millions. ALL through history !!!
Not to mention the proliferation of recessive genes like homosexuality that can degrade society as a whole.
# :idea: Trump and Putin out of the picture !
User avatar
TheeTFD
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:54 am
Location: ABQ, NM
Contact:

Re: Gays in Military ... for now

Post by TheeTFD »

Second Grade school Platitudes

Post by TheeTFD on Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:28 pm

Back in the second maybe 3rd grade school I had a teacher that would blurt out platitudes like, "the more the merrier".
To most of these I had a quick come back that would bust the class up. Usually I would say the exact opposite.
But there was at least 2 I didn't have a quick come back for. My 7 year old brain didn't comprehend.
"The more the merrier", was one and "to each his own" was the other.
To the more the merrier, maybe now I would say, "yeah at a party". Not that funny but at least I understand.
To, to each his own, which the teacher threw at me several times, I would reply now with, "and all he can seduce".
Again back in the day I wanted a class acknowledgement of laughter and maybe I wouldn't have blurted out a retort knowing thoughtful silence would follow. But I remember I didn't understand what she was saying.
# :idea: Trump and Putin out of the picture !
User avatar
TheeTFD
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:54 am
Location: ABQ, NM
Contact:

Re: Gays in Military ... for now

Post by TheeTFD »

It takes a village
-
That's what Hillary Clinton said in regards to a nation.
Yes like in "1984" when the nation needed more manual laborers they used embryos tainted with alcohol to produce
children that would be comfortable with manual labor.
The inference being children of drunks/lushes are so messed up manual labor is about all they can aspire to.
# :idea: Trump and Putin out of the picture !
Post Reply